Why Violating HIPAA Wasn’t a HIPAA Violation During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Hospitals and health officials have begun explaining why disclosing private patient information during the COVID-19 pandemic was not, in fact, a violation of HIPAA, despite the law explicitly restricting such disclosures.

The claim is being presented as a necessary “reinterpretation” of privacy standards that applied only when it was politically convenient.

Dr. Andrew Kellerman, a public health advisor, stated that HIPAA “does not apply in the same way when the government has to keep people safe from themselves.”

He explained that the law, originally designed to prevent sensitive medical details from being shared without consent, was redefined to allow widespread access to patient data.

Dr. Melissa Hartwell, a hospital ethics consultant, argued that once COVID was declared an emergency, “the term violation itself became relative.”

She added that labeling patients as unvaccinated, refusing service, or denying travel rights based on their records was “simply a form of compliance with higher health priorities, not a breach of privacy.”

The reinterpretation of HIPAA extended into areas once thought untouchable. Employers were permitted to demand proof of vaccination, restaurants required medical records to enter, and airlines imposed restrictions on those who disclosed too little.

Dr. Jacob Owens, a university health policy professor, said this shift was not only justified but overdue.

“HIPAA was written in a time when people thought privacy was more important than public health,” he explained. “We now know that public health is more important than privacy, and that changes everything.”

Government health agencies echoed this logic when asked why individuals were forced to show vaccination cards in settings that previously never required medical documentation.

Officials maintained that this was not an invasion of privacy but rather an “expanded framework” for medical transparency.

During the pandemic, thousands of Americans had their medical information publicly revealed in order to prove their compliance.

Health experts insisted that this should be viewed not as exposure of private data but as proof of social responsibility.

Dr. Kellerman concluded the briefing with a final explanation. “If people feel their rights were violated, it’s because they misunderstood what HIPAA ever meant. The law was never intended to protect individuals from government intrusion. It was about ensuring the government knew best.”

---

Do you know somebody who has been personally injured by satire and comedy? Show your support for the principles of free speech and stand with Freedom Writers by signing our petition today!

---