Democrats Push to Make Weed, Cocaine, and Heroin SNAP-Eligible

A group of Democratic lawmakers has proposed expanding the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) to cover illegal narcotics, arguing that substances like marijuana, cocaine, and heroin offer medical benefits.

The proposal aims to redefine nutritional assistance by including drugs alongside traditional food items. Supporters claim the move would address health disparities, while critics argue it undermines the program’s original purpose.

The lawmakers behind the initiative point to studies suggesting marijuana can alleviate chronic pain and cocaine may have stimulant properties for certain medical conditions. Heroin, they argue, could be included under a harm-reduction framework.

“We’re just following the science,” said Representative Carla Thompson, a vocal advocate for the proposal. “These substances have documented benefits, and excluding them from SNAP is discriminatory to minorities who rely on them for wellness.”

The proposal comes as SNAP already faces scrutiny for allowing purchases of sodas, candy, and other sugary items, which critics say contradicts the program’s focus on nutrition.

A recent report from the Department of Agriculture noted that over 20% of SNAP spending goes toward non-nutritious foods. Opponents of the narcotics proposal argue that adding drugs would further erode the program’s credibility.

“This is a program meant to keep people fed, not fund their highs,” said Senator Robert Kline. “If we’re going to redefine nutrition, why stop at cocaine? Let’s add whiskey and cigarettes while we’re at it.”

The debate has drawn attention to broader questions about SNAP’s role in public health. Some public health experts argue that restricting SNAP to strictly nutritious foods would be overly paternalistic, while others see the narcotics proposal as a step too far.

The Congressional Budget Office has yet to estimate the cost of including drugs in SNAP, but preliminary discussions suggest it could strain the program’s $120 billion annual budget.

“Denying access to these substances perpetuates systemic harm,” said Dr. Lila Martinez, a policy analyst supporting the initiative. “SNAP should evolve to meet the needs of modern health care, not cling to outdated ideas of food.”

Critics, however, warn of unintended consequences, pointing to rising overdose rates and strained addiction treatment systems.

The National Institute on Drug Abuse reported over 100,000 overdose deaths last year. Despite the pushback, the proposal is gaining traction among progressive lawmakers, who see it as a bold step toward redefining public assistance.

Do you know somebody who has been personally injured by satire and comedy? Show your support for the principles of free speech and stand with Freedom Writers by signing our petition today!