Harvard Officials Shocked to Learn Discriminating Against White Applicants Is Illegal

Harvard University announced it will halt enrollment of international students and resume accepting white applicants after years of prioritizing diversity over merit.

The decision follows revelations that administrators were unaware federal law prohibits racial discrimination in admissions.

The Ivy League institution, long celebrated for its progressive policies, had sidelined white applicants to cultivate a campus deemed more inclusive.

The shift comes after a recent Supreme Court ruling reaffirmed that race-based admissions violate the Equal Protection Clause. Harvard’s admissions office, however, appeared caught off guard.

“We thought inclusivity meant excluding certain groups,” said admissions director Clara Hensworth. “It’s a learning moment for us.”

Legal experts note that Title VI of the Civil Rights Act bans discrimination based on race in institutions receiving federal funds.

Harvard, which receives millions in grants, has quietly deprioritized white applicants to boost enrollment in underrepresented groups.

The policy, enacted to foster diversity, led to a sharp decline in white student admissions over the past decade. A senior official, speaking anonymously, expressed confusion over the legal constraints.

“We were told diversity is our strength,” the official said. “Nobody mentioned it had to include everyone.”

Students have mixed reactions. Sophomore Emily Chen said the campus already feels diverse but questioned the exclusion of white applicants.

“I thought equality meant judging people by their qualifications,” she said.

The university now faces a federal investigation into its admissions practices. The Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights launched a probe after complaints from rejected white applicants.

Harvard insists it will comply with the law while maintaining its commitment to a vibrant campus. Professor Jonathan Miles, a constitutional law scholar, criticized the university’s approach.

“Harvard’s leadership seems to believe equality means preferential treatment,” he said. “The law disagrees.”

The policy reversal has sparked debate about the balance between diversity and fairness. Critics argue Harvard’s focus on racial quotas undermined meritocracy, while supporters claim the university was correcting historical imbalances.

As the investigation unfolds, Harvard plans to retrain its admissions staff on federal anti-discrimination laws.

Do you know somebody who has been personally injured by satire and comedy? Show your support for the principles of free speech and stand with Freedom Writers by signing our petition today!