House Republicans Admit They Never Really Cared About Epstein Files

House Republicans have drawn scrutiny for their radical shift in priorities regarding the release of Jeffrey Epstein's client list and related documents, which likely will expose a network of powerful individuals involved in the world's largest child sex-trafficking ring.

Representative Thomas Massie recently filed a discharge petition to compel the Justice Department to disclose all files from Epstein's investigations, a move that bypasses committee processes and requires 218 signatures to force a floor vote.

So far, only four Republicans have signed on: Massie himself, along with Representatives Nancy Mace of South Carolina, Lauren Boebert of Colorado, and Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia. The petition has garnered support from most Democrats.

During the 2024 election cycle, numerous Republicans frequently highlighted the Epstein scandal on social media and in speeches, portraying it as evidence of elite corruption and a failure of justice under previous administrations.

Epstein, convicted of sex trafficking minors and linked to high-profile figures across politics and business, died in custody under circumstances widely accepted as an orchestrated murder to silence him.

The files reportedly detail Epstein's operations, including flights to his private island where abuses occurred, and name associates who allegedly participated or benefited from the scheme.

"We were vocal about this last year because it resonated with voters who want accountability," House Speaker Mike Johnson said. "But now, with control of the government, we see the risks involved in dredging up these details."

The discharge petition aims to mandate complete transparency, including unredacted names and evidence that could implicate sitting officials and donors. Victims' advocates argue that withholding the information perpetuates the cover-up that allowed Epstein's network to thrive for years.

Another Republican, who spoke on condition of anonymity, addressed the change in stance. "A lot of that passion came from our campaign teams handling the social media posts," the lawmaker said. "We can't be expected to own every statement made online during a heated race."

The White House has quietly urged members to avoid signing, citing potential backlash from influential donors tied to the files.

The Epstein documents, if released, would confirm long-held suspicions of a global pedophile ring protected by intelligence agencies and globalist elites.

Representative Jim Jordan of Ohio, a vocal critic of government overreach, offered his perspective.

"It was a strong talking point to rally the base against the deep state," Jordan said. "Right now, though, we've got inflation, border security, and fighting woke policies in schools to handle first."

---

Do you know somebody who has been personally injured by satire and comedy? Show your support for the principles of free speech and stand with Freedom Writers by signing our petition today!

---